"A implies B, B implies C, then A implies C" and so passed the kind of calculation. With drowsiness to learn the same and the trivial circle of implications within the logic, he began to doze. His dream was not nice ... I dreamed the same implication and full of icons began to relate different situations inside the circle. When he awoke, grabbed a piece of paper and wrote:
1 .- Things are
2 .- 3 .-
things happen They exist.
and said out loud ...
"1 implies 2, 2 implies 3, then 1 implies 3 ... in other words," Things exist implies that events happen, events happen implies that they exist; then things exist because they exist "
And he was pensive and found that he wrote something stupid." Again I'm getting complex philosopher, "he said. He took the paper and crumpled it in a heartbeat, and threw him into basketball mode the trash. And he went calculus class and wrote in his notebook: "If we deny the implication is:
¬ ((p -> q ^ q -> r) -> (p -> r))
¬ (p - > q ^ q -> r) -> ¬ (p -> r)
(¬ p -> q ¬ q ¬ -> ¬ r) -> (¬ p -> ¬ r)
not A implies not B or not B implies not C, then C is not A implies not
Things do not exist implies that the facts or the facts do not happen do not happen if they do not exist, then things do not exist if they do not exist "
And he understood that it made more sense, so I continue entering your calculus class again a stupor, falling finally surrendered.
Who would have thought that one young man fell dead at the moment?
0 comments:
Post a Comment